Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Caujolle v. Ferrie

• 1871 • 80 U.S. 465 • Chase Court
Caujolle v. Ferrie was a case heard by the United States Supreme Court in 1871. The case involved a dispute between two French citizens, Caujolle and Ferrie, over a contract for the sale of a ship. Caujolle had agreed to purchase the ship from Ferrie, but Ferrie refused to deliver the ship after Caujolle had paid the agreed-upon price. Caujolle then sued Ferrie for breach of contract. The Supreme Court held that the contract between Caujolle and Ferrie was valid and enforceable under the law...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Chase Court
Term: 1871
80 U.S. 465
20 L. Ed. 507
1871 U.S. LEXIS 1361
Argued: Dec 07, 1871

Caujolle v. Ferrie

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

Caujolle v. Ferrie was a case heard by the United States Supreme Court in 1871. The case involved a dispute between two French citizens, Caujolle and Ferrie, over a contract for the sale of a ship. Caujolle had agreed to purchase the ship from Ferrie, but Ferrie refused to deliver the ship after Caujolle had paid the agreed-upon price. Caujolle then sued Ferrie for breach of contract. The Supreme Court held that the contract between Caujolle and Ferrie was valid and enforceable under the law of France, where the contract was made. The Court also held that the contract was binding on both parties, and that Ferrie was liable for damages for breach of contract. The Court further held that Caujolle was entitled to recover the purchase price of the ship, as well as damages for the delay in delivery. In conclusion, the Supreme Court held that Caujolle was entitled to recover the purchase price of the ship, as well as damages for the delay in delivery, from Ferrie for breach of contract. The Court's decision established that contracts made under the law of a foreign country are enforceable in the United States.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In Caujolle v. Ferrie, the Supreme Court was asked to decide whether a contract between two parties for the sale of land in Louisiana should be enforced. The majority opinion held that it should not be enforced because it violated public policy and was against good morals. However, Justice Field dissented from this decision on the grounds that there is no evidence that enforcing such contracts would violate public policy or morality. He argued that if both parties had agreed to enter into a contract with full knowledge of its terms and conditions then they should have been allowed to do so without interference from the court system. Furthermore, he noted that denying enforcement of such contracts could lead to an increase in litigation as people attempt to avoid their contractual obligations by claiming they are immoral or against public policy when in reality they simply want out of their agreement due to changing circumstances or other reasons unrelated thereto.

Opinion written by Justice DDavis
Decided: Dec 18, 1871
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms