Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Central Railroad Company Of Pennsylvania v. Pennsylvania

• 1961 • 370 U.S. 607 • Warren Court
In the 1961 case Central Railroad Company of Pennsylvania v. Pennsylvania, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in favor of the railroad company, striking down a state tax on freight tonnage as unconstitutional under Article I, Section 10 of the Constitution which prohibits states from imposing taxes on exports and imports without congressional consent. The State of Pennsylvania had imposed a tax on all freight carried by railroads within its borders including interstate commerce; however, this was...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Warren Court
Term: 1961
Docket: 400
370 U.S. 607
82 S. Ct. 1297
8 L. Ed. 2d 720
1962 U.S. LEXIS 848
Argued: Mar 20, 1962

Central Railroad Company Of Pennsylvania v. Pennsylvania

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In the 1961 case Central Railroad Company of Pennsylvania v. Pennsylvania, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in favor of the railroad company, striking down a state tax on freight tonnage as unconstitutional under Article I, Section 10 of the Constitution which prohibits states from imposing taxes on exports and imports without congressional consent. The State of Pennsylvania had imposed a tax on all freight carried by railroads within its borders including interstate commerce; however, this was found to be an infringement upon federal authority over interstate commerce. The court held that while states have power to levy property or income taxes on corporations operating within their boundaries - even those involved in interstate commerce - they cannot impose direct burdens such as tonnage duties which could potentially interfere with free flow of trade among states.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion for Central Railroad Company of Pennsylvania v. Pennsylvania, Justice Frankfurter argued that the majority's decision was inconsistent with previous rulings and principles regarding interstate commerce. He contended that the tax imposed by Pennsylvania on freight transported within its borders did not discriminate against interstate commerce as it applied equally to all carriers, regardless of whether they were involved in intrastate or interstate transport. Furthermore, he pointed out that this type of taxation had been upheld previously by the Court in other cases involving similar circumstances. Thus, according to him, there was no valid reason for striking down such a non-discriminatory tax now simply because some portion of the taxed activity happened to involve goods moving across state lines.

Opinion written by Justice JHarlan(2)
Decided: Jun 25, 1962
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms