Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Chappell v. United States

• 1895 • 160 U.S. 499 • Fuller Court
In the case of Chappell v. United States in 1895, the U.S Supreme Court ruled on a matter concerning copyright law. The plaintiff, William A. Chappell, had copyrighted five books of music under one title and later sold them separately without any indication that they were part of a larger collection. When another party began selling similar individual sheets of music, Chappell sued for copyright infringement. The court held that since each sheet was not individually marked with its own...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Fuller Court
Term: 1895
Docket: 91
160 U.S. 499
16 S. Ct. 397
40 L. Ed. 510
1896 U.S. LEXIS 2116

Chappell v. United States

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In the case of Chappell v. United States in 1895, the U.S Supreme Court ruled on a matter concerning copyright law. The plaintiff, William A. Chappell, had copyrighted five books of music under one title and later sold them separately without any indication that they were part of a larger collection. When another party began selling similar individual sheets of music, Chappell sued for copyright infringement. The court held that since each sheet was not individually marked with its own copyright notice (as required by law at the time), it did not enjoy separate protection under the original collective work's copyright registration; therefore no violation occurred when others reproduced individual pieces from this collection. This decision clarified an important aspect regarding how copyrights apply to collections or compilations: if parts are intended to be used independently and do not carry their own notices, they may lack protection afforded to whole works.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion for Chappell v. United States, Justice Harlan disagreed with the majority's decision to uphold a conviction based on evidence obtained through an unauthorized search and seizure. He argued that such actions violated the Fourth Amendment rights of citizens, which protect against unreasonable searches and seizures without probable cause or a warrant issued by a judge. In his view, allowing this kind of evidence to be used in court would undermine these constitutional protections and could lead to abuses of power by law enforcement officials. Furthermore, he believed that it was not enough for courts simply to disapprove of illegal methods; they must also refuse to accept any results gained from them in order to deter future violations.

Opinion written by Justice HGray
Decided: Jan 06, 1896
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms