Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Cheney Brothers Company Et Al. v. Commonwealth Of Massachusetts

• 1917 • 246 U.S. 147 • White Court
In the case of Cheney Brothers Company et al. v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts, 1917, the U.S Supreme Court was tasked with determining whether a Massachusetts law that prohibited corporations from deducting fines imposed on them for violating labor laws from their taxable income violated the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The Cheney Brothers Company had been fined for violating state labor laws and sought to deduct these fines when calculating its corporate excise tax...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief White Court
Term: 1917
Docket: 12
246 U.S. 147
38 S. Ct. 295
62 L. Ed. 632
1918 U.S. LEXIS 1530
Argued: Apr 20, 1916

Cheney Brothers Company Et Al. v. Commonwealth Of Massachusetts

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In the case of Cheney Brothers Company et al. v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts, 1917, the U.S Supreme Court was tasked with determining whether a Massachusetts law that prohibited corporations from deducting fines imposed on them for violating labor laws from their taxable income violated the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The Cheney Brothers Company had been fined for violating state labor laws and sought to deduct these fines when calculating its corporate excise tax liability in Massachusetts. The company argued that this prohibition constituted an arbitrary deprivation of property without due process of law because it effectively increased their punishment beyond what was prescribed by statute for violation of labor laws. The court ruled against Cheney Brothers Company, upholding the constitutionality of the Massachusetts law prohibiting such deductions. It held that there was no constitutional right to a deduction and therefore no deprivation occurred as a result thereof; thus, there could be no violation under Due Process Clause.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

The dissenting opinion in the Cheney Brothers Company v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts case argued that the state law, which required foreign corporations to obtain a license before doing business within its borders and pay an annual fee based on capital stock, was unconstitutional. The justice believed it violated both the Commerce Clause and Equal Protection Clause of the U.S Constitution. He contended that this law placed an undue burden on interstate commerce by imposing additional costs solely on out-of-state companies while exempting domestic ones from such fees. Furthermore, he asserted that it discriminated against foreign corporations without any rational basis for differentiation, thereby infringing upon their equal protection rights under Fourteenth Amendment.

Opinion written by Justice WVanDevanter
Decided: Mar 04, 1918
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms