Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Chicago, Burlington, And Kansas City Railroad v. Guffey

• 1886 • 120 U.S. 569 • Waite Court
This case was a dispute between the Chicago, Burlington, and Kansas City Railroad (CB&KC) and the state of Kansas. The CB&KC had been granted a charter by the state of Kansas in 1872, which allowed them to construct a railroad line through the state. However, in 1887, the state passed a law that imposed a tax on the CB&KC's gross receipts from the operation of its railroad. The CB&KC argued that the tax was unconstitutional, as it violated the Contract Clause of the United States Constitution....Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Waite Court
Term: 1886
Docket: 1244
120 U.S. 569
7 S. Ct. 693
30 L. Ed. 732
1887 U.S. LEXIS 2001
Argued: Jan 03, 1887

Chicago, Burlington, And Kansas City Railroad v. Guffey

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

This case was a dispute between the Chicago, Burlington, and Kansas City Railroad (CB&KC) and the state of Kansas. The CB&KC had been granted a charter by the state of Kansas in 1872, which allowed them to construct a railroad line through the state. However, in 1887, the state passed a law that imposed a tax on the CB&KC's gross receipts from the operation of its railroad. The CB&KC argued that the tax was unconstitutional, as it violated the Contract Clause of the United States Constitution. The Supreme Court agreed with the CB&KC, ruling that the tax was unconstitutional and that the state of Kansas had violated the Contract Clause. The Court held that the state had interfered with the CB&KC's contractual rights by imposing the tax, and that the tax was an unconstitutional burden on interstate commerce. The Court also held that the tax was not a valid exercise of the state's police power, as it was not necessary to protect the public health, safety, or welfare. As a result, the Court struck down the tax as unconstitutional.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In Chicago, Burlington, and Kansas City Railroad v. Guffey, the Supreme Court was tasked with determining whether a state law that imposed taxes on railroad companies for their gross earnings violated the Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution. The majority opinion held that it did not violate this clause because it only taxed intrastate commerce and thus fell within a state’s power to regulate its own internal affairs. However, Justice Field dissented from this decision arguing that such taxation could have an effect on interstate commerce since railroads often operated in multiple states at once. He argued that if each state were allowed to impose taxes like these then they would be able to indirectly tax interstate commerce by taxing all of a company's operations regardless of which states those operations took place in. Thus he concluded that such laws should be struck down as unconstitutional under the Commerce Clause as they are essentially attempting to regulate something outside of their jurisdiction - namely interstate trade between different states or countries.

Opinion written by Justice JHarlan(1)
Decided: Mar 07, 1887
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms