Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Clark v. Trust Company

• 1879 • 100 U.S. 149 • Waite Court
In Clark v. Trust Company, the Supreme Court of the United States was asked to decide whether a trust company had the authority to act as a trustee for a trust created by a will. The trust company had been appointed as trustee by the will, but the will did not explicitly grant the trust company the authority to act as a trustee. The Supreme Court held that the trust company had the authority to act as a trustee. The Court reasoned that the trust company was appointed as trustee by the will,...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Waite Court
Term: 1879
Docket: 58
100 U.S. 149
25 L. Ed. 573
1879 U.S. LEXIS 1819
Argued: Nov 07, 1879

Clark v. Trust Company

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In Clark v. Trust Company, the Supreme Court of the United States was asked to decide whether a trust company had the authority to act as a trustee for a trust created by a will. The trust company had been appointed as trustee by the will, but the will did not explicitly grant the trust company the authority to act as a trustee. The Supreme Court held that the trust company had the authority to act as a trustee. The Court reasoned that the trust company was appointed as trustee by the will, and that the will was sufficient to grant the trust company the authority to act as a trustee. The Court also noted that the trust company had accepted the appointment and had acted as a trustee for some time before the dispute arose. The Court concluded that the trust company had the authority to act as a trustee, and that the trust company was not liable for any breach of trust. The Court also held that the trust company was entitled to the compensation provided for in the will.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

Justice Field delivered the dissenting opinion in Clark v. Trust Company, arguing that the majority's decision was inconsistent with prior Supreme Court precedent and would lead to a dangerous expansion of federal power. He argued that Congress had no authority under Article I, Section 8 of the Constitution to pass legislation regulating state banks' issuance of notes or other obligations for circulation as money. According to Justice Field, this power belonged solely to the states and could not be delegated by them without violating their sovereignty. Furthermore, he noted that if Congress were allowed such broad powers over state banking activities then it would have "the same control over all business pursuits" within each state which is prohibited by both the letter and spirit of our Constitution. Finally, Justice Field concluded his dissent by noting that while there may be some need for uniformity among different states when it comes to banking regulations this should only come through cooperation between them rather than an unconstitutional delegation from one sovereign entity (Congress) onto another (the States).

Opinion written by Justice JHarlan(1)
Decided: Dec 01, 1879
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms