Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Cleland, Administrator Of Veterans' Administration, Et Al. v. National College Of Business

• 1977 • 435 U.S. 213 • Burger Court
The U.S. Supreme Court case Cleland, Administrator of Veterans' Administration, et al. v. National College of Business in 1977 dealt with the issue of whether or not a private business college was entitled to receive payment from the Veterans' Administration (VA) for tuition and other fees for students who were veterans under the GI Bill but had withdrawn before completing their courses. The VA argued that it should only be required to pay for actual instruction received by veteran-students...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Burger Court
Term: 1977
Docket: 77-716
435 U.S. 213
98 S. Ct. 1024
55 L. Ed. 2d 225
1978 U.S. LEXIS 67

Cleland, Administrator Of Veterans' Administration, Et Al. v. National College Of Business

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

The U.S. Supreme Court case Cleland, Administrator of Veterans' Administration, et al. v. National College of Business in 1977 dealt with the issue of whether or not a private business college was entitled to receive payment from the Veterans' Administration (VA) for tuition and other fees for students who were veterans under the GI Bill but had withdrawn before completing their courses. The VA argued that it should only be required to pay for actual instruction received by veteran-students while they were enrolled at the school, rather than paying upfront costs regardless of student completion rates as per contract between VA and schools. The court ruled in favor of the VA stating that federal regulations did not require them to make payments when no educational services were provided due to early withdrawal by students.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion for Cleland v. National College of Business, Justice Brennan disagreed with the majority's interpretation of 38 U.S.C. §1791(a)(3). He argued that this statute does not require a school to be publicly funded in order to qualify as a "nonprofit educational institution." Instead, he believed that any school which reinvests its earnings back into itself rather than distributing them as profit should meet this definition. Furthermore, he contended that Congress intended for veterans to have broad access to educational opportunities under the G.I. Bill and other similar programs; therefore, excluding private nonprofit schools from these benefits would contradict legislative intent. Finally, Justice Brennan pointed out inconsistencies in how different federal agencies interpret "nonprofit," suggesting a need for uniformity across government departments.

Opinion written by Justice
Decided: Mar 20, 1978
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms