Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Coker v. Georgia

• 1976 • 433 U.S. 584 • Burger Court
In the Coker v. Georgia case of 1976, the U.S Supreme Court ruled that a death sentence for rape is grossly disproportionate and excessive punishment, hence unconstitutional under the Eighth Amendment's cruel and unusual punishment clause. The case involved Ehrlich Anthony Coker who had been sentenced to death by a Georgia court for raping an adult woman. In its decision, the Supreme Court emphasized that while rape is without doubt deserving of serious punishment, it does not involve taking of...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Burger Court
Term: 1976
Docket: 75-5444
433 U.S. 584
97 S. Ct. 2861
53 L. Ed. 2d 982
1977 U.S. LEXIS 146
Argued: Mar 28, 1977

Coker v. Georgia

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In the Coker v. Georgia case of 1976, the U.S Supreme Court ruled that a death sentence for rape is grossly disproportionate and excessive punishment, hence unconstitutional under the Eighth Amendment's cruel and unusual punishment clause. The case involved Ehrlich Anthony Coker who had been sentenced to death by a Georgia court for raping an adult woman. In its decision, the Supreme Court emphasized that while rape is without doubt deserving of serious punishment, it does not involve taking of human life and therefore cannot be equated with murder in terms of severity and irrevocability. This landmark ruling effectively abolished capital punishment for crimes against individuals where no one was killed.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion for Coker v. Georgia, Justice Byron White argued that the death penalty was not a disproportionate punishment for rape, particularly when considering the severity and impact of such a crime on its victims. He contended that it was inappropriate to categorically rule out capital punishment in all cases of rape regardless of circumstances or state law provisions. Furthermore, he disagreed with the majority's interpretation of evolving societal standards regarding cruel and unusual punishments as reflected by legislative enactments and jury decisions across states. Instead, he believed these trends were inconclusive at best due to various factors influencing them beyond mere moral judgment about appropriateness of penalties. Therefore, according to him, this decision should be left up to individual states rather than being dictated by Supreme Court interpretations.

Opinion written by Justice BRWhite
Decided: Jun 29, 1977
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcript
Argued: Oct 05, 2026
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms