Colgate-Palmolive Co. v. Cook Chemical Co.

Opinion summary

Etalia.ai summary of the majority opinion

The case involved a dispute over patent infringement between Colgate-Palmolive Co. and Cook Chemical Co. The central issue was whether the 'sudden and effective' language in a patent claim for an insecticide composition could be interpreted to cover both instantaneous and gradual processes of killing insects. Colgate-Palmolive argued that their product did not infringe on Cook's patent because it operated through a different mechanism than described in the claims, specifically targeting insects gradually rather than suddenly. The Supreme Court held that the interpretation of 'sudden' should align with its ordinary meaning, thus excluding products like those from Colgate-Palmolive which do not act instantaneously as per the patented process description.

Opinion written by Justice Clark

Decided 21 Feb 1966 · Official report

usrep383orders.pdfOpen in a new tab