Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Colorado-wyoming Gas Co. v. Federal Power Commission Et Al.

• 1944 • 324 U.S. 626 • Stone Court
The U.S. Supreme Court case Colorado-Wyoming Gas Co. v. Federal Power Commission et al., 1944, centered around the jurisdiction of the Federal Power Commission (FPC) over natural gas companies operating within a single state but selling to interstate pipelines. The Colorado-Wyoming Gas Company argued that because it only operated in one state, its rates should not be regulated by the FPC under the Natural Gas Act of 1938 which was designed for interstate commerce regulation. However, since...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Stone Court
Term: 1944
Docket: 575
324 U.S. 626
65 S. Ct. 850
89 L. Ed. 1235
1945 U.S. LEXIS 2257
Argued: Jan 30, 1945

Colorado-wyoming Gas Co. v. Federal Power Commission Et Al.

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

The U.S. Supreme Court case Colorado-Wyoming Gas Co. v. Federal Power Commission et al., 1944, centered around the jurisdiction of the Federal Power Commission (FPC) over natural gas companies operating within a single state but selling to interstate pipelines. The Colorado-Wyoming Gas Company argued that because it only operated in one state, its rates should not be regulated by the FPC under the Natural Gas Act of 1938 which was designed for interstate commerce regulation. However, since their product eventually reached other states through sales to an interstate pipeline company, they were deemed subject to federal regulation by lower courts and this decision was upheld by the Supreme Court on appeal. The court ruled that even though Colorado-Wyoming's operations were intrastate in nature, their sale of gas destined for out-of-state consumers made them part of an overall scheme of interstate commerce and thus fell under federal jurisdiction as per Congress' intent when passing the Natural Gas Act.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

The dissenting opinion in the case of Colorado-Wyoming Gas Co. v. Federal Power Commission et al., 1944, argued that the Federal Power Commission (FPC) did not have jurisdiction over sales of natural gas by producers to pipelines for resale because such transactions were part of interstate commerce and thus outside FPC's regulatory authority under the Natural Gas Act. The dissenters contended that Congress had intended to exclude production and gathering from regulation when it passed this act, as these activities are inherently local in nature. They also pointed out that allowing FPC to regulate these aspects would lead to a significant expansion of federal power into areas traditionally controlled by states, potentially undermining state sovereignty and disrupting established industry practices.

Opinion written by Justice WODouglas
Decided: Apr 02, 1945
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms