Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Commissioner Of Internal Revenue v. Wheeler Et Al., Executors, Et Al.

• 1944 • 324 U.S. 542 • Stone Court
In the case of Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Wheeler et al., Executors, et al., 1944, the U.S Supreme Court was tasked with determining whether a trust created by a decedent for his wife and children could be considered part of his gross estate under Section 811(c) of the Internal Revenue Code. The decedent had retained income from the trust during his lifetime but relinquished control over its principal before he died. The court held that since the decedent did not retain any power or...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Stone Court
Term: 1944
Docket: 354
324 U.S. 542
65 S. Ct. 799
89 L. Ed. 1166
1945 U.S. LEXIS 2752
Argued: Feb 02, 1945

Commissioner Of Internal Revenue v. Wheeler Et Al., Executors, Et Al.

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In the case of Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Wheeler et al., Executors, et al., 1944, the U.S Supreme Court was tasked with determining whether a trust created by a decedent for his wife and children could be considered part of his gross estate under Section 811(c) of the Internal Revenue Code. The decedent had retained income from the trust during his lifetime but relinquished control over its principal before he died. The court held that since the decedent did not retain any power or interest in changing who would enjoy possession or enjoyment after their death, it should not be included in their gross estate. This decision clarified how trusts are treated for tax purposes when they are established prior to death without retaining any powers over them.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion for Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Wheeler et al., Executors, et al., Justice Robert H. Jackson argued that the majority's decision was inconsistent with both statutory language and legislative intent. He contended that Congress intended to tax all income from whatever source derived unless explicitly exempted by law, and therefore, it should include gifts inter vivos in gross estate for taxation purposes as well. He also pointed out that there is no explicit exemption in the statute for such transfers made within two years of death without consideration or expectation of survival; hence they should be considered part of a decedent’s gross estate subject to federal estate taxes under Section 811(c) of the Internal Revenue Code. Furthermore, he criticized the majority's reliance on previous court decisions rather than interpreting directly from congressional statutes.

Opinion written by Justice RHJackson
Decided: Mar 26, 1945
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms