Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Commissioners Of Johnson County v. January

• 1876 • 94 U.S. 202 • Waite Court
This case was a dispute between the Commissioners of Johnson County and a man named January. The Commissioners of Johnson County had issued a tax deed to January for a piece of land in the county. January had paid the taxes on the land for several years, but the Commissioners refused to issue a deed to him. January then brought a suit against the Commissioners, claiming that he was entitled to a deed for the land. The Supreme Court ruled in favor of January, finding that the Commissioners had...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Waite Court
Term: 1876
Docket: 581
94 U.S. 202
24 L. Ed. 110
1876 U.S. LEXIS 1849

Commissioners Of Johnson County v. January

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

This case was a dispute between the Commissioners of Johnson County and a man named January. The Commissioners of Johnson County had issued a tax deed to January for a piece of land in the county. January had paid the taxes on the land for several years, but the Commissioners refused to issue a deed to him. January then brought a suit against the Commissioners, claiming that he was entitled to a deed for the land. The Supreme Court ruled in favor of January, finding that the Commissioners had acted unlawfully in refusing to issue a deed to him. The Court held that the Commissioners had a duty to issue a deed to January, as he had paid the taxes on the land for several years. The Court also held that the Commissioners had acted in an arbitrary and capricious manner in refusing to issue a deed to January. The Court ordered the Commissioners to issue a deed to January for the land in question.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the case of Commissioners of Johnson County v. January, the Supreme Court was asked to decide whether a county board had authority to issue bonds for railroad purposes without an election. The majority opinion held that such power did not exist and thus the bonds were invalid. However, Justice Field dissented from this decision on two grounds: firstly, he argued that it was within the scope of legislative powers granted by state law; secondly, he noted that there had been no showing or proof of any fraud or illegality in connection with issuing these bonds. He concluded by stating his belief that "the validity and binding force" of these obligations should be upheld as they were issued in good faith and with full knowledge on behalf of all parties involved.

Opinion written by Justice NHSwayne
Decided: Mar 13, 1877
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms