Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Compagnie Internationale De Produits Alimentaires S. A. v. Miller, As Alien Property Custodian Of The United States, Et Al.

• 1924 • 266 U.S. 473 • Taft Court
The U.S. Supreme Court case Compagnie Internationale de Produits Alimentaires S.A. v. Miller, as Alien Property Custodian of the United States, et al., 1924 revolved around a dispute over property seized during World War I under the Trading with the Enemy Act of 1917. The plaintiff was a French corporation that had its assets confiscated by A. Mitchell Palmer, then Alien Property Custodian for the U.S government because it was believed to be owned or controlled by an enemy nation (Germany). The...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Taft Court
Term: 1924
Docket: 412
266 U.S. 473
45 S. Ct. 169
69 L. Ed. 388
1925 U.S. LEXIS 299
Argued: Nov 25, 1924

Compagnie Internationale De Produits Alimentaires S. A. v. Miller, As Alien Property Custodian Of The United States, Et Al.

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

The U.S. Supreme Court case Compagnie Internationale de Produits Alimentaires S.A. v. Miller, as Alien Property Custodian of the United States, et al., 1924 revolved around a dispute over property seized during World War I under the Trading with the Enemy Act of 1917. The plaintiff was a French corporation that had its assets confiscated by A. Mitchell Palmer, then Alien Property Custodian for the U.S government because it was believed to be owned or controlled by an enemy nation (Germany). The company sued for recovery of their properties arguing they were not "enemy-owned" but rather majority-owned by Swiss and French nationals who were neutral in WWI conflict. However, evidence showed that despite nominal ownership being non-German, actual control resided with German interests due to contractual agreements between shareholders which gave them significant influence over operations and profits distribution. The court ruled against Compagnie Internationale de Produits Alimentaires S.A., upholding seizure on grounds that effective control mattered more than formal ownership in determining whether a firm could be considered "enemy-owned". This ruling established precedent regarding interpretation of what constitutes “ownership” under Trading with Enemy Act.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

The dissenting opinion in the case of Compagnie Internationale de Produits Alimentaires S.A. v. Miller, as Alien Property Custodian of the United States, et al., argued that the majority's decision was inconsistent with previous rulings and principles established by international law. The dissenting justices believed that a foreign corporation should not be treated as an enemy simply because it is owned or controlled by individuals who are citizens of enemy nations during wartime. They contended that this approach could lead to unjust results and potentially harm innocent parties who have no connection to any hostile activities against the U.S.. Furthermore, they disagreed with the majority's interpretation of relevant statutes and suggested that these laws were intended to protect American interests rather than punish foreign entities without due process.

Opinion written by Justice JCMcReynolds
Decided: Jan 05, 1925
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms