Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Compania General De Tabacos De Filipinas v. Collector Of Internal Revenue

• 1928 • 279 U.S. 306 • Taft Court
In the case of Compania General de Tabacos De Filipinas v. Collector of Internal Revenue, 1928, the U.S Supreme Court ruled in favor of the tobacco company. The issue at hand was whether or not a tax imposed on leaf tobacco by Philippine law was applicable to a Spanish corporation that had been operating in the Philippines since before American sovereignty over these islands began in 1899. The court held that under an old treaty between Spain and America (the Treaty of Paris), which ended the...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Taft Court
Term: 1928
Docket: 335
279 U.S. 306
49 S. Ct. 304
73 L. Ed. 704
1929 U.S. LEXIS 340
Argued: Mar 01, 1929

Compania General De Tabacos De Filipinas v. Collector Of Internal Revenue

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In the case of Compania General de Tabacos De Filipinas v. Collector of Internal Revenue, 1928, the U.S Supreme Court ruled in favor of the tobacco company. The issue at hand was whether or not a tax imposed on leaf tobacco by Philippine law was applicable to a Spanish corporation that had been operating in the Philippines since before American sovereignty over these islands began in 1899. The court held that under an old treaty between Spain and America (the Treaty of Paris), which ended the Spanish-American War and ceded control over certain territories including Philippines to America, existing property rights were protected from new taxation unless explicitly stated otherwise by Congress. Since there was no explicit provision for this particular tax within any Congressional legislation, it could not be applied retroactively against Compania General de Tabacos De Filipinas.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion for Compania General de Tabacos De Filipinas v. Collector of Internal Revenue, Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr. argued that the majority's decision was inconsistent with previous rulings and principles of international law. He contended that a foreign corporation should not be taxed on income derived from sources outside U.S jurisdiction, even if it had an office in the United States where profits were realized or received. According to him, this would amount to double taxation as such corporations are already subject to tax in their home countries based on global income. Furthermore, he expressed concern about potential retaliation by other nations which could harm American businesses operating abroad.

Opinion written by Justice HFStone
Decided: Apr 08, 1929
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms