Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Compania General De Tabacos De Filipinas v. Alhambra Cigar & Cigarette Manufacturing Company

• 1918 • 249 U.S. 72 • White Court
The U.S. Supreme Court case Compania General de Tabacos de Filipinas v. Alhambra Cigar & Cigarette Manufacturing Company in 1918 revolved around a dispute over the use of trademarks on tobacco products between two companies operating in the Philippines, which was then an American territory. The plaintiff, Compania General de Tabacos de Filipinas (CGTF), accused Alhambra Cigar & Cigarette Manufacturing Company of infringing upon its trademark rights by using similar labels and packaging for...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief White Court
Term: 1918
Docket: 180
249 U.S. 72
39 S. Ct. 224
63 L. Ed. 484
1919 U.S. LEXIS 2227

Compania General De Tabacos De Filipinas v. Alhambra Cigar & Cigarette Manufacturing Company

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

The U.S. Supreme Court case Compania General de Tabacos de Filipinas v. Alhambra Cigar & Cigarette Manufacturing Company in 1918 revolved around a dispute over the use of trademarks on tobacco products between two companies operating in the Philippines, which was then an American territory. The plaintiff, Compania General de Tabacos de Filipinas (CGTF), accused Alhambra Cigar & Cigarette Manufacturing Company of infringing upon its trademark rights by using similar labels and packaging for their products that could potentially confuse consumers. However, the court ruled against CGTF stating that it had failed to establish exclusive ownership over these marks under Philippine law or any other applicable jurisdiction's laws prior to its registration with US Patent Office after annexation of Philippines by United States. Therefore, it did not have grounds to prevent others from using similar marks within this territory.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion for Compania General de Tabacos De Filipinas v. Alhambra Cigar & Cigarette Manufacturing Company, it was argued that the plaintiff should not be allowed to bring a lawsuit in U.S. courts because they were operating under an illegal monopoly granted by Spain in the Philippines before American control of those islands. The justice believed that allowing such a suit would effectively endorse and enforce this unjust monopoly, which is contrary to American principles of free competition and antitrust laws. Furthermore, he contended that since the plaintiff's business practices violated these principles, they should not be able to seek protection from U.S courts against alleged trademark infringement by another company.

Opinion written by Justice WRDay
Decided: Mar 03, 1919
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms