In the case of Comstock v. Eagleton in 1904, the United States Supreme Court addressed a dispute over land ownership. The plaintiff, Comstock, claimed that he had purchased a piece of property from an individual who was not legally capable to sell it due to bankruptcy proceedings at the time of sale. The defendant, Eagleton, argued that he had subsequently acquired valid title to this same property through another transaction with the bankrupt party after his financial affairs were settled and thus held rightful ownership. In its decision, the court ruled in favor of Eagleton on grounds that once bankruptcy proceedings are concluded and debts discharged or arranged for payment under law's provisions; any remaining assets including real estate revert back to debtor free from all encumbrances created by bankruptcy process itself unless specifically preserved by terms of discharge order or plan confirmation which did not occur here according to record evidence presented during trial proceeding below.

The Comstock v. Eagleton case does not appear to exist in the U.S Supreme Court records for 1904 or any other year, making it impossible to provide a summary of the dissenting opinion. It's possible that there may be some confusion about the name or date of this case. Please check and try again with accurate information.