Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance Co. Et Al. v. Moore, Comptroller Of The State Of New York

• 1947 • 333 U.S. 541 • Vinson Court
In the 1947 case Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance Co. et al. v. Moore, Comptroller of the State of New York, the U.S Supreme Court ruled in favor of New York state's right to tax out-of-state insurance companies on premiums collected from policyholders residing within its borders. The plaintiffs, a group of life insurance companies incorporated outside New York but doing business within it, argued that such taxation violated both their due process rights and interstate commerce clause...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Vinson Court
Term: 1947
Docket: 337
333 U.S. 541
68 S. Ct. 682
92 L. Ed. 2d 863
1948 U.S. LEXIS 2372
Argued: Dec 19, 1947

Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance Co. Et Al. v. Moore, Comptroller Of The State Of New York

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In the 1947 case Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance Co. et al. v. Moore, Comptroller of the State of New York, the U.S Supreme Court ruled in favor of New York state's right to tax out-of-state insurance companies on premiums collected from policyholders residing within its borders. The plaintiffs, a group of life insurance companies incorporated outside New York but doing business within it, argued that such taxation violated both their due process rights and interstate commerce clause protections under the Constitution. However, Justice Hugo Black delivered an opinion for a unanimous court rejecting these claims and upholding states' authority to levy taxes on businesses operating within their jurisdiction regardless of where they are incorporated or headquartered.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion for Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance Co. et al. v. Moore, Justice Jackson argued that New York's tax on out-of-state insurance companies was unconstitutional because it violated the Commerce Clause of the U.S Constitution by imposing a direct burden on interstate commerce. He contended that this case should not be distinguished from previous cases where similar taxes were struck down as unconstitutional burdens on interstate commerce simply because insurance is considered a unique type of business or product in legal terms. Instead, he believed that any state-imposed tax affecting transactions and activities crossing state lines should be subject to scrutiny under the Commerce Clause regardless of what kind of business or product is involved.

Opinion written by Justice SFReed
Decided: Mar 29, 1948
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms