Opinion summary
Etalia.ai summary of the majority opinion
The case involved a dispute over the interpretation of the Black Lung Benefits Act, which provides compensation to coal miners suffering from pneumoconiosis (black lung disease). Consolidation Coal Co. challenged an award of benefits to a miner, arguing that the evidence did not support his claim under the standards set by federal regulations. The Supreme Court was tasked with determining whether substantial evidence supported the administrative law judge's decision in favor of awarding benefits. The Court upheld lower court rulings affirming that sufficient medical and employment history substantiated claims for black lung benefits despite conflicting interpretations presented by Consolidation Coal Co., emphasizing deference to agency expertise in evaluating complex factual determinations related to occupational diseases.
Opinion written by Justice Blackmun
Decided 24 Jun 1991 · Official report