Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Coopers & Lybrand v. Livesay Et Al.

• 1977 • 437 U.S. 463 • Burger Court
In the case of Coopers & Lybrand v. Livesay et al., 1977, the U.S Supreme Court ruled that a plaintiff's appeal to class certification denial does not qualify as a "final decision" and is therefore not immediately appealable under federal law (28 U.S.C §1291). The lawsuit was initially filed by employees against their employer, alleging racial discrimination in promotions. The District Court denied class action status on grounds that common issues did not predominate over individual ones. When...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Burger Court
Term: 1977
Docket: 76-1836
437 U.S. 463
98 S. Ct. 2454
57 L. Ed. 2d 351
1978 U.S. LEXIS 117
Argued: Mar 22, 1978

Coopers & Lybrand v. Livesay Et Al.

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In the case of Coopers & Lybrand v. Livesay et al., 1977, the U.S Supreme Court ruled that a plaintiff's appeal to class certification denial does not qualify as a "final decision" and is therefore not immediately appealable under federal law (28 U.S.C §1291). The lawsuit was initially filed by employees against their employer, alleging racial discrimination in promotions. The District Court denied class action status on grounds that common issues did not predominate over individual ones. When plaintiffs appealed this ruling directly to the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals, it reversed the lower court’s decision based on its “death-knell” doctrine which allowed immediate appeals if denying class status would end litigation for all practical purposes. However, upon reaching the Supreme Court, it rejected this doctrine stating such decisions were inherently interlocutory and could only be reviewed after final judgment on entire proceedings had been passed.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion for Coopers & Lybrand v. Livesay, Justice Thurgood Marshall argued that the majority's decision was inconsistent with both precedent and practicality. He contended that a denial of class certification should be considered an appealable final order because it effectively ends the lawsuit for all but one plaintiff, making it functionally equivalent to a dismissal. Furthermore, he pointed out that forcing individual plaintiffs to proceed separately would result in inefficient repetition of effort and could potentially lead to inconsistent judgments on identical issues. Finally, he expressed concern about potential abuse by defendants who might use strategic timing of motions to deny class certification in order to force plaintiffs into separate lawsuits or discourage them from pursuing their claims at all.

Opinion written by Justice JPStevens
Decided: Jun 21, 1978
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms