Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Coughran v. Bigelo

• 1896 • 164 U.S. 301 • Fuller Court
In the 1896 Supreme Court case Coughran v. Bigelo, the court ruled on a dispute involving land ownership and mineral rights in Colorado. The plaintiff, Coughran, claimed that he had purchased mining property from Bigelo only to discover later that it was worthless because it contained no valuable minerals. He sued for fraud and deceit, alleging that Bigelo had misrepresented the value of the property. However, according to evidence presented at trial, both parties were aware of an assay report...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Fuller Court
Term: 1896
Docket: 53
164 U.S. 301
17 S. Ct. 117
41 L. Ed. 442
1896 U.S. LEXIS 1863
Argued: May 07, 1896

Coughran v. Bigelo

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In the 1896 Supreme Court case Coughran v. Bigelo, the court ruled on a dispute involving land ownership and mineral rights in Colorado. The plaintiff, Coughran, claimed that he had purchased mining property from Bigelo only to discover later that it was worthless because it contained no valuable minerals. He sued for fraud and deceit, alleging that Bigelo had misrepresented the value of the property. However, according to evidence presented at trial, both parties were aware of an assay report indicating low mineral content before finalizing their transaction. The Supreme Court held in favor of defendant Bigelo stating there was no misrepresentation or concealment by him as both parties knew about the condition of mine through an assay report prior to purchase agreement. Therefore, since there wasn't any fraudulent behavior involved from defendant's side while selling his property with low mineral content; hence plaintiff's claim for being deceived into buying a worthless piece is invalid.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion for Coughran v. Bigelo, it was argued that the majority's decision to uphold a lower court ruling - which held that an agreement between two parties involving land in Arizona Territory was not enforceable due to lack of consideration - failed to properly interpret and apply contract law principles. The dissenting justice believed that there had been sufficient consideration on both sides: one party agreed to sell his property while the other promised payment upon completion of certain conditions. He also disagreed with the majority's view about what constituted "valuable" or "adequate" consideration, arguing instead for a broader interpretation where any act or forbearance by one party at another’s request could be deemed valuable enough as long as it involved some detriment or inconvenience suffered by the promisee, regardless of its monetary worth. Furthermore, he contended that even if no legal obligation existed initially between these parties when they made their agreement (as per common law), such an obligation should have arisen once they began performing their respective parts under this arrangement.

Opinion written by Justice GShiras
Decided: Nov 30, 1896
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms