Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

County Of Moultrie v. Rockingham Ten-cent Savings-bank

• 1875 • 92 U.S. 631 • Waite Court
In County of Moultrie v. Rockingham Ten-Cent Savings-Bank, the Supreme Court of the United States was asked to decide whether a county could tax a savings bank located within its boundaries. The savings bank argued that it was exempt from taxation under the laws of the state of Virginia, where it was located. The county argued that it had the right to tax the savings bank under its own laws. The Supreme Court held that the county did not have the right to tax the savings bank. The Court...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Waite Court
Term: 1875
Docket: 532
92 U.S. 631
23 L. Ed. 631
1875 U.S. LEXIS 1799

County Of Moultrie v. Rockingham Ten-cent Savings-bank

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In County of Moultrie v. Rockingham Ten-Cent Savings-Bank, the Supreme Court of the United States was asked to decide whether a county could tax a savings bank located within its boundaries. The savings bank argued that it was exempt from taxation under the laws of the state of Virginia, where it was located. The county argued that it had the right to tax the savings bank under its own laws. The Supreme Court held that the county did not have the right to tax the savings bank. The Court reasoned that the savings bank was a private corporation, and that the state of Virginia had the exclusive power to regulate and tax such corporations. The Court further held that the county could not impose a tax on the savings bank without the express authority of the state. The Court concluded that the county had no authority to tax the savings bank, and that the savings bank was exempt from taxation under the laws of the state of Virginia.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

Justice Field delivered the dissenting opinion in County of Moultrie v. Rockingham Ten-Cent Savings-Bank, arguing that the majority's decision was wrongfully decided and should be reversed. He argued that a state statute which authorized counties to issue bonds for public works projects did not grant them authority to create corporations or lend money on their own credit. The county had issued bonds with its own name printed on them, but Justice Field contended this was done without any legal authority from either the legislature or Congress and thus violated both federal and state laws. Furthermore, he argued that since there were no statutory provisions authorizing such an action by a county government, it could not be legally enforced against creditors who had loaned money based upon these bonds being valid obligations of the county itself. In conclusion, Justice Field believed that if states wanted to authorize counties to issue corporate debt they must do so through legislation rather than allowing individual counties themselves to make such decisions unilaterally without proper authorization from higher authorities first.

Opinion written by Justice WStrong
Decided: Apr 10, 1876
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms