Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Crew Levick Company v. Commonwealth Of Pennsylvania

• 1917 • 245 U.S. 292 • White Court
In the case of Crew Levick Company v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, 1917, the Supreme Court examined whether a state could impose a tax on foreign corporations for the privilege of doing business within its borders. The plaintiff, Crew Levick Company - an oil company incorporated in New Jersey but operating extensively in Pennsylvania - argued that such taxation was unconstitutional as it violated both due process and equal protection clauses under Fourteenth Amendment. However, the court ruled...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief White Court
Term: 1917
Docket: 499
245 U.S. 292
38 S. Ct. 126
62 L. Ed. 295
1917 U.S. LEXIS 1737
Argued: Oct 17, 1917

Crew Levick Company v. Commonwealth Of Pennsylvania

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In the case of Crew Levick Company v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, 1917, the Supreme Court examined whether a state could impose a tax on foreign corporations for the privilege of doing business within its borders. The plaintiff, Crew Levick Company - an oil company incorporated in New Jersey but operating extensively in Pennsylvania - argued that such taxation was unconstitutional as it violated both due process and equal protection clauses under Fourteenth Amendment. However, the court ruled against them stating that states have broad powers to levy taxes on businesses operating within their jurisdiction even if they are based out-of-state. It held that there is no constitutional impediment preventing states from taxing foreign corporations for conducting business activities within their territory provided these companies enjoy benefits and protections offered by those states' laws and government services.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion for Crew Levick Company v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, it was argued that the tax imposed by Pennsylvania on foreign corporations doing business within its borders is unconstitutional. The dissenting justices believed that this tax violated both the Due Process Clause and the Commerce Clause of the U.S Constitution. They contended that a state cannot impose a tax on an entity simply because it does business within its boundaries; rather, there must be some direct benefit conferred upon or protection provided to such an entity by the state in order for taxation to be justified. Furthermore, they asserted that this type of taxation interferes with interstate commerce as it creates barriers and burdens for out-of-state companies seeking to do business in Pennsylvania. Therefore, they concluded that such discriminatory treatment towards foreign corporations is not permissible under constitutional law.

Opinion written by Justice MPitney
Decided: Dec 10, 1917
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms