Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Crown, Cork & Seal Co., Inc. v. Parker

• 1982 • 462 U.S. 345 • Burger Court
In the case of Crown, Cork & Seal Co., Inc. v. Parker (1982), the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that a plaintiff's cause of action for discriminatory termination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act begins to accrue when he or she receives notice of termination and not on their last day at work as previously assumed by lower courts. The court held that this interpretation was consistent with both congressional intent and practical considerations related to employment discrimination litigation,...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Burger Court
Term: 1982
Docket: 82-118
462 U.S. 345
103 S. Ct. 2392
76 L. Ed. 2d 628
1983 U.S. LEXIS 58
Argued: Apr 18, 1983

Crown, Cork & Seal Co., Inc. v. Parker

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In the case of Crown, Cork & Seal Co., Inc. v. Parker (1982), the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that a plaintiff's cause of action for discriminatory termination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act begins to accrue when he or she receives notice of termination and not on their last day at work as previously assumed by lower courts. The court held that this interpretation was consistent with both congressional intent and practical considerations related to employment discrimination litigation, such as allowing plaintiffs sufficient time to seek legal counsel and prepare their cases before filing suit. This ruling effectively extended the statute of limitations for bringing such claims, providing greater protections for workers who believe they have been unlawfully terminated due to race, color, religion, sex or national origin.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion for Crown, Cork & Seal Co., Inc. v. Parker, Justice Powell argued that the majority's decision to extend the statute of limitations in discrimination cases was not supported by legislative history or precedent and could lead to an influx of stale claims. He contended that this ruling would allow plaintiffs to bring forth lawsuits years after alleged discriminatory acts occurred, which could potentially harm defendants who may no longer have access to evidence necessary for their defense due to passage of time. Furthermore, he expressed concern about potential abuse where a plaintiff might delay filing a claim simply because they are still employed at the company and fear retaliation if they file sooner. Justice Powell believed it is important for legal disputes be resolved as quickly as possible so parties can move forward without lingering uncertainty.

Opinion written by Justice HABlackmun
Decided: Jun 13, 1983
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcript
Argued: Oct 05, 2026
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms