Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Dahn v. Davis, Agent, Etc.

• 1921 • 258 U.S. 421 • Taft Court
In the case of Dahn v. Davis, Agent, Etc., 1921, the United States Supreme Court was asked to consider whether a lower court had jurisdiction over a suit brought by an individual against an agent of the federal government. The plaintiff in this case was seeking damages for alleged wrongful acts committed by the defendant while acting as an agent for the U.S. Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corporation during World War I. The Supreme Court ruled that it did not have jurisdiction because Congress...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Taft Court
Term: 1921
Docket: 166
258 U.S. 421
42 S. Ct. 320
66 L. Ed. 696
1922 U.S. LEXIS 2291
Argued: Mar 10, 1922

Dahn v. Davis, Agent, Etc.

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In the case of Dahn v. Davis, Agent, Etc., 1921, the United States Supreme Court was asked to consider whether a lower court had jurisdiction over a suit brought by an individual against an agent of the federal government. The plaintiff in this case was seeking damages for alleged wrongful acts committed by the defendant while acting as an agent for the U.S. Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corporation during World War I. The Supreme Court ruled that it did not have jurisdiction because Congress had not explicitly provided for such suits in its legislation establishing and governing these wartime agencies. Therefore, any claims against agents or employees of these organizations needed to be pursued through administrative channels rather than through lawsuits in federal courts.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

The dissenting opinion in the case of Dahn v. Davis, Agent, Etc., 1921 is not readily available or well-documented in public records. This could be due to the age of the case and limitations on historical legal documentation during that time period. Therefore, a summary cannot be provided without further information or access to more comprehensive legal archives.

Opinion written by Justice JHClarke
Decided: Apr 10, 1922
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms