Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Dakota County v. Glidden

• 1884 • 113 U.S. 222 • Waite Court
Dakota County v. Glidden is a United States Supreme Court case that was decided in 1885. The case involved a dispute between Dakota County and the Glidden family over the ownership of a piece of land. The Glidden family had purchased the land from the United States government in 1856, but Dakota County claimed that the land had been granted to them by the Minnesota legislature in 1858. The Supreme Court ruled in favor of the Glidden family, finding that the land had been legally purchased from...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Waite Court
Term: 1884
Docket: 921
113 U.S. 222
5 S. Ct. 428
28 L. Ed. 981
1885 U.S. LEXIS 1673

Dakota County v. Glidden

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

Dakota County v. Glidden is a United States Supreme Court case that was decided in 1885. The case involved a dispute between Dakota County and the Glidden family over the ownership of a piece of land. The Glidden family had purchased the land from the United States government in 1856, but Dakota County claimed that the land had been granted to them by the Minnesota legislature in 1858. The Supreme Court ruled in favor of the Glidden family, finding that the land had been legally purchased from the United States government and that the Minnesota legislature had no authority to grant the land to Dakota County. The Court held that the Glidden family had a valid title to the land and that Dakota County had no right to it. The decision established the principle that the United States government has the exclusive right to dispose of public lands, and that state legislatures cannot grant such lands to private individuals or entities.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In Dakota County v. Glidden, the Supreme Court was tasked with deciding whether a county could be held liable for damages caused by its negligence in failing to keep a bridge in repair. The majority opinion found that counties are not responsible for such damages and thus cannot be sued. Justice Field dissented from this decision, arguing that it would lead to an unjust result as the injured party would have no recourse against the county despite their clear negligence in maintaining the bridge. He further argued that allowing suits against counties is consistent with established legal principles of liability and does not conflict with any constitutional provisions or state laws; therefore, he concluded, it should be allowed here as well.

Opinion written by Justice SFMiller
Decided: Jan 26, 1885
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms