Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Davies, Collector, v. Corbin & Others

• 1884 • 112 U.S. 36 • Waite Court
In Davies, Collector v. Corbin & Others, the Supreme Court of the United States was asked to decide whether the federal government had the authority to impose a tax on the sale of distilled spirits. The case arose when the Collector of Internal Revenue attempted to collect a tax from the defendants, who had purchased distilled spirits from a distiller in Kentucky. The defendants argued that the tax was unconstitutional because it was not authorized by Congress. The Supreme Court held that the...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Waite Court
Term: 1884
112 U.S. 36
5 S. Ct. 4
28 L. Ed. 627
1884 U.S. LEXIS 1850

Davies, Collector, v. Corbin & Others

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In Davies, Collector v. Corbin & Others, the Supreme Court of the United States was asked to decide whether the federal government had the authority to impose a tax on the sale of distilled spirits. The case arose when the Collector of Internal Revenue attempted to collect a tax from the defendants, who had purchased distilled spirits from a distiller in Kentucky. The defendants argued that the tax was unconstitutional because it was not authorized by Congress. The Supreme Court held that the federal government had the authority to impose the tax. The Court reasoned that the power to tax was an inherent power of the federal government, and that Congress had the authority to impose taxes on the sale of distilled spirits. The Court also held that the tax was not a violation of the Constitution because it was not a direct tax, and therefore did not require apportionment among the states. The Court's decision in Davies, Collector v. Corbin & Others established that the federal government had the authority to impose taxes on the sale of distilled spirits. The decision also established that the tax was not a direct tax, and therefore did not require apportionment among the states.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In Davies, Collector v. Corbin & Others, the Supreme Court was asked to decide whether a tax imposed by Congress on distilled spirits manufactured in the United States and exported from it was constitutional. The majority opinion held that such a tax did not violate any provision of the Constitution and thus could be lawfully collected. However, Justice Field dissented from this decision arguing that Congress had no power to impose taxes upon exports as doing so would interfere with foreign commerce which is solely within the purview of states under their police powers granted by Article I Section 10 Clause 3 of the Constitution. He further argued that since there were already existing state laws governing taxation related to exports, allowing for federal taxation would create an unnecessary conflict between state and federal law which should be avoided if possible.

Opinion written by Justice MRWaite
Decided: Oct 27, 1884
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms