Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Davis v. Aetna Acceptance Co.

• 1934 • 293 U.S. 328 • Hughes Court
In the case of Davis v. Aetna Acceptance Co., 1934, the Supreme Court ruled on a matter involving automobile repossession and resale procedures. The plaintiff, Davis, had purchased an automobile from Aetna Acceptance Company under a conditional sales contract which allowed for repossession if payments were not made as agreed upon. After defaulting on his payments, the car was repossessed by Aetna and resold without notice to Davis or opportunity for him to pay off his debt and reclaim...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Hughes Court
Term: 1934
Docket: 68
293 U.S. 328
55 S. Ct. 151
79 L. Ed. 393
1934 U.S. LEXIS 1010
Argued: Nov 09, 1934

Davis v. Aetna Acceptance Co.

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In the case of Davis v. Aetna Acceptance Co., 1934, the Supreme Court ruled on a matter involving automobile repossession and resale procedures. The plaintiff, Davis, had purchased an automobile from Aetna Acceptance Company under a conditional sales contract which allowed for repossession if payments were not made as agreed upon. After defaulting on his payments, the car was repossessed by Aetna and resold without notice to Davis or opportunity for him to pay off his debt and reclaim possession of the vehicle. This action was in violation of Illinois law at that time which required such notice be given before resale after repossession could occur. Davis sued Aetna for damages resulting from this unlawful sale but lost in lower courts due to their interpretation that he had waived these rights when signing the initial purchase agreement with its included terms allowing for such actions upon default. The Supreme Court reversed these decisions stating that public policy did not allow individuals to waive statutory protections through private contracts unless explicitly stated within those statutes themselves - something not present in this case's relevant laws.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

The dissenting opinion in the case of Davis v. Aetna Acceptance Co., 1934, argued that the majority's decision to reverse and remand was incorrect because it failed to consider important aspects of contract law. The dissent pointed out that when a party enters into a contract, they are bound by its terms unless those terms are illegal or unconscionable. In this case, the defendant had agreed to pay for damages caused by theft but not for those resulting from conversion (unauthorized use). When his car was stolen and subsequently damaged during an unauthorized use, he sought compensation under his insurance policy with Aetna Acceptance Co. However, according to the dissenting justices, since conversion wasn't covered under their agreement as per explicit exclusion clause in insurance policy; hence there should be no obligation on part of insurer company i.e., AETNA ACCEPTANCE CO., to compensate him for such damage.

Opinion written by Justice BNCardozo
Decided: Dec 03, 1934
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms