Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Davis Et Al. v. Board Of School Commissioners Of Mobile County Et Al.

• 1970 • 402 U.S. 33 • Burger Court
In the 1970 case Davis et al. v. Board of School Commissioners of Mobile County et al., the U.S Supreme Court ruled that "freedom-of-choice" plans for desegregating schools were not sufficient to ensure compliance with Brown v. Board of Education if they did not result in actual, effective desegregation. The court held that school boards had an affirmative duty to take whatever steps might be necessary to convert a racially discriminatory public school system into a unitary one where racial...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Burger Court
Term: 1970
Docket: 436
402 U.S. 33
91 S. Ct. 1289
28 L. Ed. 2d 577
1971 U.S. LEXIS 53
Argued: Oct 13, 1970

Davis Et Al. v. Board Of School Commissioners Of Mobile County Et Al.

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In the 1970 case Davis et al. v. Board of School Commissioners of Mobile County et al., the U.S Supreme Court ruled that "freedom-of-choice" plans for desegregating schools were not sufficient to ensure compliance with Brown v. Board of Education if they did not result in actual, effective desegregation. The court held that school boards had an affirmative duty to take whatever steps might be necessary to convert a racially discriminatory public school system into a unitary one where racial discrimination would be eliminated root and branch. In this particular case, it was found that despite the freedom-of-choice plan implemented by Mobile County's board, segregation persisted due largely to societal pressures and past discrimination which led black students choosing black schools and white students choosing white ones.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion for Davis et al. v. Board of School Commissioners of Mobile County et al., Justice Hugo Black argued that the court's decision to reject a school desegregation plan was an overreach of judicial power, as it went beyond what was required by the Constitution or any federal law. He believed that this ruling would lead to courts across America becoming overly involved in managing schools and dictating educational policy, which he saw as a task better suited for local authorities who were more familiar with their communities' needs and circumstances. Furthermore, he expressed concern about how such involvement could potentially undermine public confidence in both the judiciary and public education system itself.

Opinion written by Justice WEBurger
Decided: Apr 20, 1971
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcript
Argued: Oct 05, 2026
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms