Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Deepsouth Packing Co., Inc. v. Laitram Corp.

• 1971 • 406 U.S. 518 • Burger Court
In the 1971 case DeepSouth Packing Co., Inc. v. Laitram Corp., the U.S Supreme Court ruled in favor of DeepSouth Packing, stating that it did not infringe on Laitram's patent rights by manufacturing components of a patented shrimp deveining machine and then exporting them for assembly abroad. The court held that under Section 271(a) of the Patent Act, infringement occurs only when an entire patented product is made or sold within the United States without authorization from the patent holder....Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Burger Court
Term: 1971
Docket: 71-315
406 U.S. 518
92 S. Ct. 1700
32 L. Ed. 2d 273
1972 U.S. LEXIS 162
Argued: Apr 11, 1972

Deepsouth Packing Co., Inc. v. Laitram Corp.

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In the 1971 case DeepSouth Packing Co., Inc. v. Laitram Corp., the U.S Supreme Court ruled in favor of DeepSouth Packing, stating that it did not infringe on Laitram's patent rights by manufacturing components of a patented shrimp deveining machine and then exporting them for assembly abroad. The court held that under Section 271(a) of the Patent Act, infringement occurs only when an entire patented product is made or sold within the United States without authorization from the patent holder. Since DeepSouth was neither making nor selling complete machines in America but merely parts to be assembled overseas, they were not liable for infringement according to this interpretation of law.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion for DeepSouth Packing Co., Inc. v. Laitram Corp., Justice Marshall argued that the majority's interpretation of Section 271(a) of the Patent Act was too narrow and failed to consider Congress' intent behind this legislation. He believed that by allowing a company to avoid patent infringement liability simply because they exported unassembled parts rather than assembled machines, it would undermine U.S patent law protections and encourage companies to circumvent these laws through technicalities. Furthermore, he pointed out that such an interpretation could potentially harm American businesses as foreign competitors could easily replicate their patented products without facing any legal consequences in U.S courts. Therefore, he disagreed with the majority's ruling which held DeepSouth not liable for infringing on Laitram’s patents.

Opinion written by Justice BRWhite
Decided: May 30, 1972
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcript
Argued: Oct 05, 2026
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms