Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Delaware, Lackawanna And Western Railroad Company v. Town Of Morristown Et Al.

• 1927 • 276 U.S. 182 • Taft Court
In the 1927 case of Delaware, Lackawanna and Western Railroad Company v. Town of Morristown et al., the U.S Supreme Court was tasked with determining whether a New Jersey statute that allowed municipalities to tax railroad properties at higher rates than other real estate violated the Fourteenth Amendment's Equal Protection Clause. The plaintiff, Delaware, Lackawanna and Western Railroad Company argued that this law unfairly discriminated against them by imposing an unequal burden on their...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Taft Court
Term: 1927
Docket: 147
276 U.S. 182
48 S. Ct. 276
72 L. Ed. 523
1928 U.S. LEXIS 72
Argued: Jan 06, 1928

Delaware, Lackawanna And Western Railroad Company v. Town Of Morristown Et Al.

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In the 1927 case of Delaware, Lackawanna and Western Railroad Company v. Town of Morristown et al., the U.S Supreme Court was tasked with determining whether a New Jersey statute that allowed municipalities to tax railroad properties at higher rates than other real estate violated the Fourteenth Amendment's Equal Protection Clause. The plaintiff, Delaware, Lackawanna and Western Railroad Company argued that this law unfairly discriminated against them by imposing an unequal burden on their property compared to others in the same municipality. However, after reviewing previous rulings and considering arguments from both sides, the court upheld New Jersey's right to impose different tax rates on different types of property within its jurisdiction. They concluded that there was no violation of equal protection under law as long as all properties within a particular class (in this case railroads) were taxed equally.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

The dissenting opinion in the case of Delaware, Lackawanna and Western Railroad Company v. Town of Morristown et al., argued that the majority's decision was inconsistent with previous rulings on similar matters. The dissent contended that a state should not be allowed to tax property located outside its jurisdiction, even if it is owned by a corporation operating within its borders. They believed this violated principles of interstate commerce and due process under the Constitution. Furthermore, they disagreed with the majority's interpretation of New Jersey law regarding taxation powers over railroad companies' properties situated out-of-state for use in their operations within New Jersey. In essence, they felt that allowing such taxes would create an unfair burden on corporations conducting business across multiple states.

Opinion written by Justice PButler
Decided: Feb 20, 1928
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms