Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Delaware, Lackawanna And Western Railroad Company v. Pennsylvania

• 1904 • 198 U.S. 341 • Fuller Court
In the 1904 case of Delaware, Lackawanna and Western Railroad Company v. Pennsylvania, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in favor of the railroad company, striking down a Pennsylvania law that imposed taxes on freight transported both within and across state lines by railroads incorporated outside of Pennsylvania. The court found this tax to be unconstitutional as it violated both the Commerce Clause and Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The Commerce Clause prohibits states from...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Fuller Court
Term: 1904
Docket: 208
198 U.S. 341
25 S. Ct. 669
49 L. Ed. 1077
1905 U.S. LEXIS 1108
Argued: Apr 10, 1905

Delaware, Lackawanna And Western Railroad Company v. Pennsylvania

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In the 1904 case of Delaware, Lackawanna and Western Railroad Company v. Pennsylvania, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in favor of the railroad company, striking down a Pennsylvania law that imposed taxes on freight transported both within and across state lines by railroads incorporated outside of Pennsylvania. The court found this tax to be unconstitutional as it violated both the Commerce Clause and Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The Commerce Clause prohibits states from interfering with interstate commerce while the Equal Protection clause prevents states from treating entities differently based solely on their place of incorporation or business operations location. Therefore, taxing out-of-state corporations at a higher rate than in-state ones was deemed discriminatory and unlawful.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion for Delaware, Lackawanna and Western Railroad Company v. Pennsylvania, Justice Harlan argued that the majority's decision was inconsistent with previous rulings of the Court regarding interstate commerce. He contended that a state has no power to tax property located outside its borders or to impose taxes on operations conducted entirely within another state. The justice believed that by allowing Pennsylvania to tax coal mined in other states but transported through its territory, it effectively allowed one state to control and limit trade between other states - an authority which he asserted belonged solely to Congress under the Commerce Clause of the Constitution. Furthermore, he expressed concern about potential retaliation from other states leading to a breakdown in free trade among them if such taxation were permitted.

Opinion written by Justice RWPeckham
Decided: May 15, 1905
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms