Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Demorest Et Al. v. City Bank Farmers Trust Co., Trustee, Et Al.

• 1943 • 321 U.S. 36 • Stone Court
In the 1943 case Demorest et al. v. City Bank Farmers Trust Co., Trustee, et al., the U.S Supreme Court dealt with a dispute over inheritance tax laws in New York State. The plaintiffs were beneficiaries of a trust established by their late father and contested that they should not be subjected to pay an inheritance tax on income generated from securities held within the trust because these securities were physically located outside of New York state at the time of their father's death....Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Stone Court
Term: 1943
Docket: 52
321 U.S. 36
64 S. Ct. 384
88 L. Ed. 526
1944 U.S. LEXIS 1128
Argued: Dec 10, 1943

Demorest Et Al. v. City Bank Farmers Trust Co., Trustee, Et Al.

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In the 1943 case Demorest et al. v. City Bank Farmers Trust Co., Trustee, et al., the U.S Supreme Court dealt with a dispute over inheritance tax laws in New York State. The plaintiffs were beneficiaries of a trust established by their late father and contested that they should not be subjected to pay an inheritance tax on income generated from securities held within the trust because these securities were physically located outside of New York state at the time of their father's death. However, both lower courts ruled against them based on previous precedents which stated that intangible personal property (like stocks and bonds) is deemed to be located at the domicile of its owner for taxation purposes regardless of where it is actually situated or where it was created. The Supreme Court upheld these rulings, stating that while there are exceptions to this rule under certain circumstances such as when tangible property has acquired an actual situs elsewhere due to being used in business activities outside its owner’s domicile - those exceptions did not apply here since no evidence suggested any active use or management of said securities outside New York state by either decedent prior his death or trustee afterwards.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

The dissenting opinion in the case of Demorest et al. v. City Bank Farmers Trust Co., Trustee, et al., argued that the majority's decision was inconsistent with previous rulings and principles regarding trusts and estates. The dissenters believed that a trust should not be considered as having been created until it has actually received property or assets to manage, which had not occurred at the time of Mrs. Demorest's death in this case. They also disagreed with the majority's interpretation of New York law on future interests, arguing that it did not support their conclusion about when a trust is established for tax purposes. Furthermore, they contended that even if there were ambiguity in state law on this point, federal tax laws should govern how such matters are handled for estate tax purposes.

Opinion written by Justice RHJackson
Decided: Jan 17, 1944
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms