Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Deseret Salt Company v. Tarpey

• 1891 • 142 U.S. 241 • Fuller Court
The U.S. Supreme Court case Deseret Salt Company v. Tarpey in 1891 revolved around a dispute over the ownership of certain salt lands and springs located near Great Salt Lake, Utah. The plaintiff, Deseret Salt Company, claimed that they had acquired these properties through purchase from individuals who held possession under Mexican grants recognized by the United States government. However, defendant Michael Tarpey argued that he was entitled to the land due to his compliance with federal laws...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Fuller Court
Term: 1891
Docket: 96
142 U.S. 241
12 S. Ct. 158
35 L. Ed. 999
1891 U.S. LEXIS 2582
Argued: Nov 24, 1891

Deseret Salt Company v. Tarpey

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

The U.S. Supreme Court case Deseret Salt Company v. Tarpey in 1891 revolved around a dispute over the ownership of certain salt lands and springs located near Great Salt Lake, Utah. The plaintiff, Deseret Salt Company, claimed that they had acquired these properties through purchase from individuals who held possession under Mexican grants recognized by the United States government. However, defendant Michael Tarpey argued that he was entitled to the land due to his compliance with federal laws regarding saline land claims and because he was first to file for patent on this property after it became open for public sale following a survey conducted by U.S authorities. The court ruled in favor of Tarpey stating that although Mexican grants were generally respected under US law as per Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo (1848), such rights did not extend to saline lands which were considered part of public domain and thus subject to disposal according to federal legislation only. Therefore, despite any prior private agreements or sales concerning these lands before their official surveying and opening for claim filing by US government didn't confer valid title upon purchasers like Deseret.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion for Deseret Salt Company v. Tarpey, Justice Brewer argued that the majority's decision was inconsistent with previous rulings of the Court and violated principles of federalism. He contended that states should have jurisdiction over their own resources, including salt deposits within their borders. In his view, it was not appropriate for a federal court to intervene in a dispute between two private parties over these resources based on an interpretation of Congress' intent in granting land to Utah upon its admission as a state. Furthermore, he believed that if Congress had intended to reserve certain rights or privileges regarding these lands for itself or third parties like Deseret Salt Company, it would have expressly said so in legislation rather than leaving this important matter open to judicial interpretation.

Opinion written by Justice SJField
Decided: Dec 21, 1891
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms