Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Deshaney, A Minor, By His Guardian Ad Litem, Et Al. v. Winnebago County Department Of Social Services Et Al.

• 1988 • 489 U.S. 189 • Rehnquist Court
In the 1988 case of DeShaney v. Winnebago County Department of Social Services, Joshua DeShaney, a minor who had been severely beaten by his father and subsequently suffered significant brain damage, sued the department for failing to prevent this abuse despite being aware of it. The Supreme Court ruled in favor of Winnebago County DSS with a 6-3 decision. The court held that while state agencies may have an ethical or moral duty to protect citizens from private violence, they are not...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Rehnquist Court
Term: 1988
Docket: 87-154
489 U.S. 189
109 S. Ct. 998
103 L. Ed. 2d 249
1989 U.S. LEXIS 1039
Argued: Nov 02, 1988

Deshaney, A Minor, By His Guardian Ad Litem, Et Al. v. Winnebago County Department Of Social Services Et Al.

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In the 1988 case of DeShaney v. Winnebago County Department of Social Services, Joshua DeShaney, a minor who had been severely beaten by his father and subsequently suffered significant brain damage, sued the department for failing to prevent this abuse despite being aware of it. The Supreme Court ruled in favor of Winnebago County DSS with a 6-3 decision. The court held that while state agencies may have an ethical or moral duty to protect citizens from private violence, they are not constitutionally required to do so unless there is a special custodial relationship between the individual and the state (such as incarceration). In other words, because Joshua was not in state custody at any point during his ordeal but remained under his father's care throughout - even though social services knew about potential danger - no constitutional violation occurred when they failed to intervene more decisively.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the DeShaney v. Winnebago County Department of Social Services case, Justice Brennan's dissenting opinion argued that the majority had misinterpreted the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. He contended that when a state has knowledge of child abuse and fails to protect a child from such harm, it is indeed violating their constitutional rights. The state's inaction or failure to intervene effectively makes them complicit in this violation. Furthermore, he criticized the majority for ignoring precedents where states were held accountable for failing to protect individuals from third-party harms under similar circumstances. Ultimately, Brennan believed that Joshua DeShaney’s substantive due process rights were violated by Winnebago County’s deliberate indifference towards his safety and wellbeing.

Opinion written by Justice WHRehnquist
Decided: Feb 22, 1989
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcript
Argued: Oct 05, 2026
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms