Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Detroit Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations Board

• 1978 • 440 U.S. 301 • Burger Court
In the case of Detroit Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations Board, 1978, the U.S Supreme Court ruled in favor of Detroit Edison Company against a decision by the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB). The NLRB had previously ordered that individual test scores and aptitude tests should be disclosed to unions upon request as part of collective bargaining agreements. However, this was challenged by Detroit Edison on grounds that such disclosure would violate an employee's right to privacy and...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Burger Court
Term: 1978
Docket: 77-968
440 U.S. 301
99 S. Ct. 1123
59 L. Ed. 2d 333
1979 U.S. LEXIS 66
Argued: Nov 06, 1978

Detroit Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations Board

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In the case of Detroit Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations Board, 1978, the U.S Supreme Court ruled in favor of Detroit Edison Company against a decision by the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB). The NLRB had previously ordered that individual test scores and aptitude tests should be disclosed to unions upon request as part of collective bargaining agreements. However, this was challenged by Detroit Edison on grounds that such disclosure would violate an employee's right to privacy and breach confidentiality agreements with psychological testing services used for these exams. The Supreme Court agreed with this argument stating that there is no statutory obligation under the National Labor Relations Act requiring employers to disclose such information during collective bargaining negotiations if it infringes upon employees' rights or breaches contracts with third parties.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion for Detroit Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations Board, Justice William Brennan disagreed with the majority's view that an employer is not obliged to provide a union with psychological test scores and related data used in employee transfers and promotions. He argued that this information was necessary for unions to fulfill their duty of fair representation effectively under labor laws. The denial of such information could potentially hinder unions' ability to challenge discriminatory practices or arbitrary decisions by employers, thereby undermining workers' rights protections provided by collective bargaining agreements. Furthermore, he dismissed privacy concerns raised by the majority as these tests were administered on condition of employment and employees had no reasonable expectation of privacy regarding their results.

Opinion written by Justice PStewart
Decided: Mar 05, 1979
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcript
Argued: Oct 05, 2026
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms