Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Director, Office Of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department Of Labor v. Rasmussen Et Al.

• 1978 • 440 U.S. 29 • Burger Court
In the case of Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor v. Rasmussen et al., 1978, the Supreme Court ruled on whether a widow could claim benefits under the Federal Coal Mine Health and Safety Act (FCMHSA) for her husband's death due to pneumoconiosis or "black lung disease". The court held that even though Mr. Rasmussen had not filed a claim before his death as required by FCMHSA, Mrs. Rasmussen was still eligible to receive survivor benefits...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Burger Court
Term: 1978
Docket: 77-1465
440 U.S. 29
99 S. Ct. 903
59 L. Ed. 2d 122
1979 U.S. LEXIS 25
Argued: Nov 28, 1978

Director, Office Of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department Of Labor v. Rasmussen Et Al.

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In the case of Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor v. Rasmussen et al., 1978, the Supreme Court ruled on whether a widow could claim benefits under the Federal Coal Mine Health and Safety Act (FCMHSA) for her husband's death due to pneumoconiosis or "black lung disease". The court held that even though Mr. Rasmussen had not filed a claim before his death as required by FCMHSA, Mrs. Rasmussen was still eligible to receive survivor benefits because she met all other requirements set forth in the act. This decision clarified that while filing a claim is necessary for miners seeking disability benefits during their lifetime, it does not preclude survivors from receiving compensation after their passing if they can prove that black lung disease contributed significantly to their loved one’s demise.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion for Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor v. Rasmussen et al., Justice Rehnquist disagreed with the majority's interpretation that a widow is entitled to death benefits under the Longshoremen's and Harbor Workers' Compensation Act even if her husband’s work-related injury was not a substantial contributing cause of his death. He argued that this interpretation contradicted Congress’ intent when it enacted amendments in 1972 which required an employee’s disability or death to be "not less than" caused by employment conditions. The justice believed that these words clearly indicated Congress intended for there to be a significant causal connection between workplace injuries and subsequent disabilities or deaths before compensation could be awarded. Therefore, he concluded that Mrs. Rasmussen should not have been eligible for benefits because her husband's work-related injury did not significantly contribute to his eventual demise from heart disease.

Opinion written by Justice WHRehnquist
Decided: Feb 21, 1979
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms