Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Dixon County v. Field

• 1883 • 111 U.S. 83 • Waite Court
Dixon County v. Field was a United States Supreme Court case that addressed the issue of whether a county could be held liable for damages caused by a county employee. The case arose when a county employee, Field, was injured while working on a county road. Field sued the county for damages, claiming that the county was negligent in its supervision of the employee. The Supreme Court held that the county could be held liable for the damages caused by the employee. The Court reasoned that the...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Waite Court
Term: 1883
111 U.S. 83
4 S. Ct. 315
28 L. Ed. 360
1884 U.S. LEXIS 1760

Dixon County v. Field

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

Dixon County v. Field was a United States Supreme Court case that addressed the issue of whether a county could be held liable for damages caused by a county employee. The case arose when a county employee, Field, was injured while working on a county road. Field sued the county for damages, claiming that the county was negligent in its supervision of the employee. The Supreme Court held that the county could be held liable for the damages caused by the employee. The Court reasoned that the county was responsible for the employee's actions because it had a duty to supervise the employee and ensure that he was performing his duties in a safe manner. The Court also noted that the county had a duty to provide a safe working environment for its employees. The Court's decision in Dixon County v. Field established that counties can be held liable for damages caused by their employees. This decision has been cited in numerous cases since then, and it has been used to support the idea that employers have a duty to ensure that their employees are performing their duties in a safe manner.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In Dixon County v. Field, the Supreme Court was asked to decide whether a county could be held liable for damages caused by an employee of its sheriff's office. The majority opinion found that the county had no liability in this case because it did not have direct control over the actions of its employees and therefore could not be responsible for their conduct. Justice Field dissented from this ruling, arguing that counties should bear responsibility when their employees cause harm through negligence or wrongful acts while acting within the scope of their employment duties. He argued that allowing counties to escape liability would create an unjust situation where those injured by public servants would go uncompensated despite having suffered real losses due to another’s wrongdoing. Furthermore, he maintained that such a decision undermined public policy as it discouraged people from serving in government positions if they were unable to rely on governmental protection against potential legal claims arising out of negligent acts committed during service

Opinion written by Justice SMatthews
Decided: Mar 24, 1884
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms