Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

The Dollar Savings Bank v. United States

• 1873 • 86 U.S. 227 • Chase Court
The Dollar Savings Bank v. United States was a case heard by the United States Supreme Court in 1873. The case involved a dispute between the Dollar Savings Bank and the United States government over the bank's right to issue notes. The bank had been authorized by the state of Pennsylvania to issue notes, but the federal government argued that the notes were not legal tender and could not be used to pay taxes. The Supreme Court ruled in favor of the bank, holding that the notes were legal...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Chase Court
Term: 1873
86 U.S. 227
22 L. Ed. 80
1873 U.S. LEXIS 1442
Argued: Jan 22, 1874

The Dollar Savings Bank v. United States

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

The Dollar Savings Bank v. United States was a case heard by the United States Supreme Court in 1873. The case involved a dispute between the Dollar Savings Bank and the United States government over the bank's right to issue notes. The bank had been authorized by the state of Pennsylvania to issue notes, but the federal government argued that the notes were not legal tender and could not be used to pay taxes. The Supreme Court ruled in favor of the bank, holding that the notes were legal tender and could be used to pay taxes. The Court also held that the federal government could not interfere with the state's right to authorize the issuance of notes. This decision was important in establishing the principle of federalism, which holds that the federal government cannot interfere with the rights of the states.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the case of The Dollar Savings Bank v. United States, the Supreme Court was tasked with determining whether or not a tax imposed by Congress on national banks was constitutional. The majority opinion held that it was indeed constitutional and thus upheld the tax. However, Justice Field dissented from this ruling and argued that such a tax violated both the letter and spirit of Article I Section 8 Clause 4 of the Constitution which grants Congress power to "make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into Execution" its enumerated powers but does not grant them authority to impose taxes beyond those specifically mentioned in other clauses within Article I Section 8. He further argued that if Congress had been granted such broad taxing power then there would have been no need for any other clause granting them specific taxation authority as they could simply use their general taxation powers instead. Thus, he concluded that since no express provision existed allowing Congress to impose taxes on national banks then they were without legal authority to do so under either federal law or common sense principles of interpretation.

Opinion written by Justice WStrong
Decided: Mar 02, 1874
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms