Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Dougherty County, Georgia, Board Of Education Et Al. v. White

• 1978 • 439 U.S. 32 • Burger Court
In the case of Dougherty County, Georgia, Board of Education et al. v. White in 1978, the U.S Supreme Court ruled that a public school teacher's First Amendment rights were not violated when she was transferred to another school for publicly criticizing her superiors' policies. The court held that while public employees do not surrender their constitutional rights at work, these rights must be balanced against the state's interest in promoting efficiency and integrity in its services. In this...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Burger Court
Term: 1978
Docket: 77-120
439 U.S. 32
99 S. Ct. 368
58 L. Ed. 2d 269
1978 U.S. LEXIS 2451
Argued: Oct 02, 1978

Dougherty County, Georgia, Board Of Education Et Al. v. White

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In the case of Dougherty County, Georgia, Board of Education et al. v. White in 1978, the U.S Supreme Court ruled that a public school teacher's First Amendment rights were not violated when she was transferred to another school for publicly criticizing her superiors' policies. The court held that while public employees do not surrender their constitutional rights at work, these rights must be balanced against the state's interest in promoting efficiency and integrity in its services. In this particular case, it was determined that Ms. White’s criticisms disrupted close working relationships necessary for fulfilling her responsibilities as a teacher and thus justified her transfer by the board of education.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion for Dougherty County, Georgia, Board of Education et al. v. White (1978), Justice Rehnquist disagreed with the majority's interpretation of Title VII and its application to this case. He argued that there was no clear evidence that Ms. White was discriminated against based on her sex or race by being transferred from a bus driver position to a classroom aide role after she had been elected president of the local union chapter - an action which he believed fell within the school board’s discretion in managing their employees' assignments according to their needs and qualifications. Furthermore, he contended that it is not appropriate for courts to interfere with employers’ decisions unless there is concrete proof of discrimination under Title VII standards – something he did not see in this case.

Opinion written by Justice TMarshall
Decided: Nov 28, 1978
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcript
Argued: Oct 05, 2026
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms