Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Drake Bakeries Incorporated v. Local 50, American Bakery & Confectionery Workers International, Afl-cio, Et Al.

• 1961 • 370 U.S. 254 • Warren Court
In the case of Drake Bakeries Inc. v. Local 50, American Bakery & Confectionery Workers International, AFL-CIO et al., 1961, the U.S Supreme Court ruled in favor of Drake Bakeries Incorporated. The dispute arose when a union picketed at one of Drake's customers to compel them to stop doing business with the bakery due to an ongoing labor dispute between Drake and its employees who were members of that union. The court held that such secondary boycotts were prohibited under Section 8(b)(4)(A) of...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Warren Court
Term: 1961
Docket: 598
370 U.S. 254
82 S. Ct. 1346
8 L. Ed. 2d 474
1962 U.S. LEXIS 2196
Argued: Apr 18, 1962

Drake Bakeries Incorporated v. Local 50, American Bakery & Confectionery Workers International, Afl-cio, Et Al.

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In the case of Drake Bakeries Inc. v. Local 50, American Bakery & Confectionery Workers International, AFL-CIO et al., 1961, the U.S Supreme Court ruled in favor of Drake Bakeries Incorporated. The dispute arose when a union picketed at one of Drake's customers to compel them to stop doing business with the bakery due to an ongoing labor dispute between Drake and its employees who were members of that union. The court held that such secondary boycotts were prohibited under Section 8(b)(4)(A) of the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA). This section prohibits unions from pressuring neutral third parties - like customers or suppliers - into supporting their cause during a labor dispute with an employer. Therefore, it was illegal for the union to attempt to involve a customer in its conflict with Drake by trying to force them not only into taking sides but also damaging their own commercial interests as well.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion for Drake Bakeries Incorporated v. Local 50, American Bakery & Confectionery Workers International, AFL-CIO et al., Justice Frankfurter argued that the majority's decision was a departure from established principles of labor law and policy. He contended that the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) did not intend to give courts such broad authority to interfere in labor disputes or impose their own views on what constitutes fair bargaining practices. Instead, he believed it should be left up to the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB), which has specialized knowledge and experience in these matters. Furthermore, he disagreed with the majority's interpretation of "good faith" negotiations under NLRA - arguing that an employer is not required by law to agree with union demands or make counteroffers they deem unreasonable. In his view, this case represented an unwarranted judicial intrusion into collective bargaining process.

Opinion written by Justice BRWhite
Decided: Jun 18, 1962
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms