Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

James Dundas, Mordecai D. Lewis, Samuel W. Jones, Robert L. Pittfield, And Robert Howell, Appellants, v. Anne Hitchcock

1851 • 53 U.S. 256 • Taney Court
This Supreme Court case involved five appellants, James Dundas, Mordecai D. Lewis, Samuel W. Jones, Robert L. Pittfield and Robert Howell (the Appellants), who were appealing a decision made by the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Maryland in favor of Anne Hitchcock (the Respondent). The dispute between them arose from an agreement that was entered into on March 1st 1844 whereby they agreed to purchase certain real estate located in Baltimore City from her husband William...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Taney Court
Term: 1851
53 U.S. 256
13 L. Ed. 978
1851 U.S. LEXIS 654
Argued: Jan 09, 1852

James Dundas, Mordecai D. Lewis, Samuel W. Jones, Robert L. Pittfield, And Robert Howell, Appellants, v. Anne Hitchcock

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

This Supreme Court case involved five appellants, James Dundas, Mordecai D. Lewis, Samuel W. Jones, Robert L. Pittfield and Robert Howell (the Appellants), who were appealing a decision made by the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Maryland in favor of Anne Hitchcock (the Respondent). The dispute between them arose from an agreement that was entered into on March 1st 1844 whereby they agreed to purchase certain real estate located in Baltimore City from her husband William Hitchcock and his wife Anne for $10,000 with payment due within two years after which time interest would accrue at 6%. When payment was not received as per their agreement she brought suit against them seeking damages for breach of contract. The Circuit Court found in her favor awarding her $1150 plus costs and interest accrued since April 1st 1845 when it became due according to their agreement. On appeal to the Supreme Court however it reversed this decision finding that there had been no breach because although payments had not been made as promised they still held title to said property so could be compelled to pay what was owed upon demand or forfeit said property if necessary thus making any award unnecessary given such remedy available under existing law at that time

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In this case, the Supreme Court was asked to decide whether a deed of trust executed by Anne Hitchcock and her husband in 1839 was valid. The appellants argued that the deed did not meet certain requirements under Virginia law and should be declared invalid. However, the majority opinion held that it was valid because there had been no challenge to its validity prior to this case. In his dissenting opinion, Justice McLean disagreed with the majority's reasoning and argued that even if there had been no previous challenge, it still could have been challenged on legal grounds at any time before or during trial. He further stated that since Virginia law required certain formalities for such deeds of trust which were not met in this instance, he believed it should be declared invalid regardless of when or how long ago it had been executed.

Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms