Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Dwyer v. Dunbar

• 1866 • 72 U.S. 318 • Chase Court
DWYER v. DUNBAR was a case heard by the United States Supreme Court in 1866. The case involved a dispute between two parties over a contract for the sale of a steamboat. The plaintiff, DWYER, had contracted with the defendant, DUNBAR, to purchase a steamboat for $2,000. DWYER paid the full amount, but DUNBAR refused to deliver the boat. DWYER then sued DUNBAR for breach of contract. The Supreme Court held that DUNBAR was liable for breach of contract. The Court found that DUNBAR had failed to...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Chase Court
Term: 1866
72 U.S. 318
18 L. Ed. 489
1866 U.S. LEXIS 940

Dwyer v. Dunbar

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

DWYER v. DUNBAR was a case heard by the United States Supreme Court in 1866. The case involved a dispute between two parties over a contract for the sale of a steamboat. The plaintiff, DWYER, had contracted with the defendant, DUNBAR, to purchase a steamboat for $2,000. DWYER paid the full amount, but DUNBAR refused to deliver the boat. DWYER then sued DUNBAR for breach of contract. The Supreme Court held that DUNBAR was liable for breach of contract. The Court found that DUNBAR had failed to fulfill his contractual obligations and had acted in bad faith. The Court also held that DWYER was entitled to damages for the breach of contract. The Court awarded DWYER the full amount of the purchase price, plus interest and costs. The Court's decision in DWYER v. DUNBAR established the principle that a party who breaches a contract is liable for damages. This case also established the principle that a party who acts in bad faith is liable for additional damages. This case is an important precedent in contract law and has been cited in numerous subsequent cases.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the case of Dwyer v. Dunbar, the Supreme Court was asked to decide whether a contract between two parties could be enforced if it had been made in violation of state law. The majority opinion held that such contracts were unenforceable and should not be recognized by courts. However, Justice Field dissented from this ruling on the grounds that enforcing these contracts would not violate public policy or morals as they did not involve any illegal activity beyond what was already prohibited by state law. He argued that allowing parties to enforce their agreements would promote justice and fairness among citizens and encourage them to enter into lawful transactions with each other without fear of having their rights disregarded by courts. Furthermore, he noted that refusing to recognize such contracts might lead people who are unaware of applicable laws to unknowingly enter into invalid agreements which could result in great hardship for one party or both parties involved in the transaction.

Opinion written by Justice NHSwayne
Decided: Jan 07, 1867
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms