Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Eastern Airlines, Inc. v. Floyd Et Al.

• 1990 • 499 U.S. 530 • Rehnquist Court
In the 1990 case Eastern Airlines, Inc. v. Floyd et al., the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that passengers cannot recover damages for mental distress under Article 17 of the Warsaw Convention without accompanying physical injury or death in international air accidents. The case arose from an incident where a plane lost power in all engines and began to descend rapidly, causing panic among passengers who believed they were about to die; however, pilots managed to restart engines and land safely with...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Rehnquist Court
Term: 1990
Docket: 89-1598
499 U.S. 530
111 S. Ct. 1489
113 L. Ed. 2d 569
1991 U.S. LEXIS 2222
Argued: Oct 29, 1990

Eastern Airlines, Inc. v. Floyd Et Al.

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In the 1990 case Eastern Airlines, Inc. v. Floyd et al., the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that passengers cannot recover damages for mental distress under Article 17 of the Warsaw Convention without accompanying physical injury or death in international air accidents. The case arose from an incident where a plane lost power in all engines and began to descend rapidly, causing panic among passengers who believed they were about to die; however, pilots managed to restart engines and land safely with no physical injuries sustained by any passenger onboard. Despite this, several passengers sued Eastern Airlines for emotional distress caused by fear of impending death during descent. The court held that "bodily injury" as stated in Article 17 does not include purely psychological trauma thus barring recovery for mental injuries unless accompanied by a physical injury.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion for Eastern Airlines, Inc. v. Floyd et al., Justice Marshall argued that the majority's interpretation of Article 17 of the Warsaw Convention was incorrect and overly narrow. He contended that mental injuries should be considered as "bodily injury" under this provision, especially when they are severe and accompanied by physical manifestations such as heart palpitations or loss of consciousness. The justice also criticized the majority for relying on outdated medical understandings from 1929 (the year when Warsaw Convention was drafted) to interpret a modern legal issue, arguing that it is more appropriate to apply current scientific knowledge about psychological trauma in interpreting international treaties like this one.

Opinion written by Justice TMarshall
Decided: Apr 17, 1991
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcript
Argued: Oct 05, 2026
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms