Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

El Paso And Southwestern Railroad Company v. Vizard

• 1908 • 211 U.S. 608 • Fuller Court
In the case of El Paso and Southwestern Railroad Company v. Vizard in 1908, the U.S Supreme Court ruled on a dispute involving an injury to a railroad employee. The plaintiff, Vizard, was injured while working for the defendant company when he fell from a ladder that had been negligently placed by another employee. He sued under Texas law which allowed employees to recover damages for injuries caused by fellow servants' negligence if they were engaged in common employment. However, the...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Fuller Court
Term: 1908
Docket: 31
211 U.S. 608
29 S. Ct. 210
53 L. Ed. 348
1909 U.S. LEXIS 1792
Argued: Nov 30, 1908

El Paso And Southwestern Railroad Company v. Vizard

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In the case of El Paso and Southwestern Railroad Company v. Vizard in 1908, the U.S Supreme Court ruled on a dispute involving an injury to a railroad employee. The plaintiff, Vizard, was injured while working for the defendant company when he fell from a ladder that had been negligently placed by another employee. He sued under Texas law which allowed employees to recover damages for injuries caused by fellow servants' negligence if they were engaged in common employment. However, the defendant argued that federal law should apply instead as it did not hold employers liable for such accidents. The court held that state laws could be applied in cases involving interstate commerce only where they do not conflict with federal legislation or impede its operation; otherwise, federal law would preempt them. In this case though there was no specific federal statute covering employer liability for worker injuries at railroads involved in interstate commerce so Texas's common-law rule could apply. Therefore, despite operating across state lines (which normally brings activities within exclusive jurisdiction of Congress), since there was no conflicting Federal regulation or act regarding employer’s liability towards their workers’ safety during those times - State Law prevailed over Federal Law.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

The dissenting opinion in the case of El Paso and Southwestern Railroad Company v. Vizard argued that the majority's decision was inconsistent with previous rulings regarding employer liability for employee injuries. The dissent contended that, under existing law, employers were not liable for injuries sustained by employees due to risks inherent in their work unless negligence could be proven on part of the employer. In this case, it was argued there was no evidence to suggest any negligence or failure on behalf of the railroad company to provide a safe working environment for its employees. Therefore, according to this view, Mr.Vizard assumed all risk associated with his job when he accepted employment and thus should not have been awarded damages following his injury at work.

Opinion written by Justice DJBrewer
Decided: Jan 04, 1909
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms