Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

International Brotherhood Of Electrical Workers, Afl-cio, Et Al. v. Hechler

• 1986 • 481 U.S. 851 • Rehnquist Court
In the 1986 case International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, AFL-CIO, et al. v. Hechler, the US Supreme Court ruled that a union cannot be held liable for an injury to a worker under federal common law due to negligence or breach of duty of fair representation. The plaintiff, Elizabeth Hechler was injured while working at Potomac Electric Power Company and sued her employer and her union (International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers), alleging that they failed to maintain safe working...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Rehnquist Court
Term: 1986
Docket: 85-1360
481 U.S. 851
107 S. Ct. 2161
95 L. Ed. 2d 791
1987 U.S. LEXIS 2260
Argued: Jan 20, 1987

International Brotherhood Of Electrical Workers, Afl-cio, Et Al. v. Hechler

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In the 1986 case International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, AFL-CIO, et al. v. Hechler, the US Supreme Court ruled that a union cannot be held liable for an injury to a worker under federal common law due to negligence or breach of duty of fair representation. The plaintiff, Elizabeth Hechler was injured while working at Potomac Electric Power Company and sued her employer and her union (International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers), alleging that they failed to maintain safe working conditions as per their collective bargaining agreement. The court found in favor of the defendants stating that such claims are preempted by federal labor laws which provide exclusive remedies for workplace injuries through workers' compensation statutes.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion for International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, AFL-CIO, et al. v. Hechler (1986), Justice White disagreed with the majority's decision to allow a worker to sue her union under federal law for injuries sustained on the job due to alleged negligence by the union in its safety inspection duties. The justice argued that such claims should be governed by state law rather than federal labor law because they involve issues of personal injury and workplace safety traditionally regulated at the state level. Furthermore, he contended that allowing these suits under federal law could undermine collective bargaining agreements between unions and employers by encouraging individual workers to bypass these agreements and seek remedies in court instead. This would disrupt labor-management relations and potentially weaken unions' ability to protect their members' interests collectively.

Opinion written by Justice HABlackmun
Decided: May 26, 1987
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcript
Argued: Oct 05, 2026
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms