Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Emergency Fleet Corporation, United States Shipping Board v. Western Union Telegraph Company

• 1927 • 275 U.S. 415 • Taft Court
The U.S. Supreme Court case Emergency Fleet Corporation, United States Shipping Board v. Western Union Telegraph Company in 1927 revolved around a dispute over telegraph charges incurred by the government during World War I. The Emergency Fleet Corporation and the United States Shipping Board argued that they were exempt from paying these charges due to their governmental status, while Western Union contended that no such exemption existed for them under federal law or contract provisions. The...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Taft Court
Term: 1927
Docket: 113
275 U.S. 415
48 S. Ct. 198
72 L. Ed. 345
1928 U.S. LEXIS 44
Argued: Dec 02, 1927

Emergency Fleet Corporation, United States Shipping Board v. Western Union Telegraph Company

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

The U.S. Supreme Court case Emergency Fleet Corporation, United States Shipping Board v. Western Union Telegraph Company in 1927 revolved around a dispute over telegraph charges incurred by the government during World War I. The Emergency Fleet Corporation and the United States Shipping Board argued that they were exempt from paying these charges due to their governmental status, while Western Union contended that no such exemption existed for them under federal law or contract provisions. The court ruled in favor of Western Union, stating that there was no statutory provision granting such an exemption to these government entities and thus they were liable for payment of services rendered by the telegraph company.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion for the case of Emergency Fleet Corporation, United States Shipping Board v. Western Union Telegraph Company, Justice Holmes disagreed with the majority's decision that a government-owned corporation could sue without congressional authorization. He argued that such corporations should be treated as private entities and thus have inherent rights to sue or be sued in federal courts. According to him, these corporations were created by Congress with an intention to function independently from direct governmental control and therefore they should enjoy similar legal privileges as other independent entities do under law. The majority’s ruling, he believed, undermined this autonomy and contradicted previous court decisions which had upheld it.

Opinion written by Justice LDBrandeis
Decided: Jan 03, 1928
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms