Environmental Protection Agency v. Calumet Shreveport Refining, LLC

Questions presented

SCOTUS records, cert granted 21 Oct 2024

In a pair of final actions, the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) denied 105 petitions filed by small oil refineries seeking exemptions from the requirements of the Clean Air Act's Renewable Fuel Standard program. Six of those refineries petitioned for review of EPA's decisions in the Fifth Circuit, which denied the government's motion for transfer to the D.C. Circuit. The question presented is as follows: Whether venue for the refineries' challenges lies exclusively in the D.C. Circuit because the agency's denial actions are "nationally applicable" or, alternatively, are "based on a determination of nationwide scope or effect." 42 U.S.C. 7607(b)(1).

Opinion summary

Etalia.ai summary of the majority opinion

The case involves a dispute between the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and Calumet Shreveport Refining, LLC regarding compliance with federal environmental regulations. The EPA accused Calumet of violating the Clean Air Act by failing to implement required pollution control measures at its refinery in Shreveport, Louisiana. The central issue was whether certain emissions from the facility were subject to stricter regulatory standards due to their classification as hazardous pollutants. Calumet argued that it had adhered to all applicable guidelines and challenged the EPA's interpretation of what constituted hazardous emissions under existing statutes. In a landmark decision, the Supreme Court sided with the EPA, affirming its authority to enforce stringent controls on industrial emissions deemed harmful based on evolving scientific evidence and public health considerations.

Opinion written by Justice Thomas

Decided 18 Jun 2025 · Official report

605us2r50_g2hk.pdfOpen in a new tab

Oral argument transcript

Argued 25 Mar 2025

23-1229_3eah.pdfOpen in a new tab