Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Erie Railroad Company v. Collins

• 1919 • 253 U.S. 77 • White Court
In the case of Erie Railroad Company v. Collins, 1919, the U.S Supreme Court ruled in favor of Erie Railroad Company. The plaintiff, Collins had sued for damages after being injured while working on a train owned by the defendant company in Ohio. However, he filed his lawsuit in New York where he resided and where the company was incorporated. The court held that since both parties were residents of New York State at the time when suit was brought up; therefore it did not violate due process...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief White Court
Term: 1919
Docket: 348
253 U.S. 77
40 S. Ct. 450
64 L. Ed. 790
1920 U.S. LEXIS 1447
Argued: Jan 08, 1920

Erie Railroad Company v. Collins

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In the case of Erie Railroad Company v. Collins, 1919, the U.S Supreme Court ruled in favor of Erie Railroad Company. The plaintiff, Collins had sued for damages after being injured while working on a train owned by the defendant company in Ohio. However, he filed his lawsuit in New York where he resided and where the company was incorporated. The court held that since both parties were residents of New York State at the time when suit was brought up; therefore it did not violate due process clause under Fourteenth Amendment to subject railroad corporation to jurisdiction of courts of state wherein it has accepted service and is doing business even though cause arose from transaction occurring outside that state.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion for Erie Railroad Company v. Collins, Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr. argued that the majority's decision to hold a railroad company liable for injuries sustained by an employee due to negligence of another employee was unjustified and inconsistent with previous rulings on similar cases. He contended that under federal law, employers should not be held responsible for accidents caused by their employees' carelessness unless it could be proven that they were aware of such behavior and did nothing to correct it or prevent its recurrence. In this case, he believed there was no evidence showing the employer knew about any negligent conduct from its workers prior to the accident occurring. Therefore, he disagreed with imposing liability on them based solely on their employment relationship with the person who acted negligently.

Opinion written by Justice JMcKenna
Decided: May 17, 1920
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms