Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Estate Of Keller Et Al. v. Commissioner Of Internal Revenue

• 1940 • 312 U.S. 543 • Hughes Court
The Estate of Keller et al. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 1940 case revolved around the issue of estate tax liability. The Supreme Court was tasked with determining whether certain gifts made by a decedent prior to his death should be included in the gross estate for federal estate tax purposes. The decedent had transferred securities into a trust and retained an income interest for life, but died within three years of creating the trust without having received any income from it due to...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Hughes Court
Term: 1940
Docket: 371
312 U.S. 543
61 S. Ct. 651
85 L. Ed. 1032
1941 U.S. LEXIS 1265
Argued: Jan 10, 1941

Estate Of Keller Et Al. v. Commissioner Of Internal Revenue

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

The Estate of Keller et al. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 1940 case revolved around the issue of estate tax liability. The Supreme Court was tasked with determining whether certain gifts made by a decedent prior to his death should be included in the gross estate for federal estate tax purposes. The decedent had transferred securities into a trust and retained an income interest for life, but died within three years of creating the trust without having received any income from it due to financial difficulties faced by the company whose stock constituted most of its assets. The court ruled that these transfers were not "bona fide sales" and thus fell under Section 302(c) of the Revenue Act which stipulates that if such transfer is made without adequate consideration and death occurs within two years, then it's deemed as though transfer was intended to take effect at or after death hence taxable under federal law.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

The dissenting opinion in the case of Estate of Keller et al. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue disagreed with the majority's ruling that certain assets transferred by a decedent prior to death were includable in his gross estate for federal tax purposes. The dissent argued that the majority had misinterpreted and incorrectly applied Section 811(c) of the Internal Revenue Code, which pertains to transfers intended to take effect at or after death. They contended that this section did not apply as there was no evidence suggesting such intent on part of the decedent when transferring these assets into a trust fund during his lifetime, nor any indication he retained control over them until his death. Therefore, they believed these assets should not be included in calculating estate taxes due.

Opinion written by Justice FMurphy
Decided: Mar 03, 1941
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms