Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

E T & W N C Transportation Co. v. Currie, Commissioner Of Revenue Of North Carolina.

• 1958 • 359 U.S. 28 • Warren Court
In the case of E T & W N C Transportation Co. v. Currie, Commissioner of Revenue of North Carolina (1958), the U.S Supreme Court ruled in favor of E T & W N C Transportation Co., a railway company that challenged a tax imposed by North Carolina on its gross receipts from interstate commerce operations. The court held that this tax was unconstitutional as it violated the Commerce Clause and Due Process Clause under the Fourteenth Amendment because it discriminated against interstate commerce and...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Warren Court
Term: 1958
Docket: 524
359 U.S. 28
79 S. Ct. 602
3 L. Ed. 2d 625
1959 U.S. LEXIS 1420

E T & W N C Transportation Co. v. Currie, Commissioner Of Revenue Of North Carolina.

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In the case of E T & W N C Transportation Co. v. Currie, Commissioner of Revenue of North Carolina (1958), the U.S Supreme Court ruled in favor of E T & W N C Transportation Co., a railway company that challenged a tax imposed by North Carolina on its gross receipts from interstate commerce operations. The court held that this tax was unconstitutional as it violated the Commerce Clause and Due Process Clause under the Fourteenth Amendment because it discriminated against interstate commerce and unduly burdened it. This decision reinforced previous rulings which established that states cannot impose taxes on activities related to interstate commerce if they interfere with federal regulation or discriminate against out-of-state entities.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion for E T & W N C Transportation Co. v. Currie, Commissioner of Revenue of North Carolina, Justice Frankfurter disagreed with the majority's ruling that a state tax on interstate commerce was unconstitutional. He argued that there is no constitutional prohibition against states taxing businesses involved in interstate commerce as long as it does not discriminate or unduly burden such commerce. In his view, the tax imposed by North Carolina did not violate these principles and should have been upheld because it was applied equally to all carriers operating within the state regardless of whether their business activities were intrastate or interstate in nature. Furthermore, he contended that this case did not present any evidence suggesting an undue burden on interstate commerce resulting from this taxation scheme.

Opinion written by Justice
Decided: Mar 02, 1959
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms